Depending on the project scope, this might be ok, but something to be aware of for sure. 1% sounds pretty good, but over 100’ the error could be well over a foot (and possibly much more). Error accumulates with every subsequent scan you do (and will be worse in areas where there is not a lot of unique geometry from scan to scan). MP claims 1%, but this is misleading on an area of this size. Any CAD user will find it very intuitive to use.Ģ) be careful on the accuracy of infrared scanning, especially on a project of that size. For $400/yr, it is crazy that an architect wouldn’t have this software available if they are planning to use the point cloud for design. This is very easy to do, but better suited for the CAD user than you, because they will understand the design scope and the best way to break things up. Most engineering/architecture firms will create regions in Recap so they can deal with smaller parts of the cloud vs the whole thing. Two things to consider.ġ) Large point clouds really bog down CAD software. I have run the MP workflow all the way through Revit. All are from laser scanners, though I am an MSP that scans using MP as a hobby with my sons. I fear this is a dead end street for you (doing the Recap work long term).as the VDC (virtual design and construction) Leader at a huge US consumer products company, I deal with point clouds frequently. For example, if I get hit with ADA compliance I'd outsource that to the member on here who does it. To get that convidence I need to go through the process myself and see where the sharp edges are or figure out if I need to outsource portions. I dislike selling something without the confidence I can deliver it. He's not sure if it's the whole building or just a part of it, but he doubts there are prints and thinks this would be a great service if I could scan it and produce either a floorplan or something he could use in Revit. As we got to talking he let me know he has a side-project coming up for a remodel on a 14,500 bldg. He explained that he would prefer to receive this as a file he could use. He went on to explain that his firm has licensed AutoCad and Revit but not ReCap Pro. He explained that as a commercial architect who spends all day drawing buildings he has zero experience with importing scans. I called him the other day and told him I wanted to send him the XYZ file and see what sort of PITA it was to import for him so I would know how it went. I was trying to avoid spending $49 on evaluating the - Thank you! Any suggestions on who I should email at MP to fix their MatterPak example?Įveryone else- The whole point of this exercise was to figure out where the sharp edges were before I took on an as-built scan. But you would think they would have made sure it worked. However you will still need to purchase the correct tool for the job (recap pro). If all you are doing is simply converting the matterpak xyz into a deliverable rcp for use by your AEC clients, there are tutorials that will walk you through that. Recap pro is very inexpensive and any AEC professional with autocad/revit experience should be able to use it with very little difficulty. They are extremely robust and precise tools that need training to use properly and efficiently.) (autocad/revit are not simple programs that can be learned over the weekend. You must first use recap to convert the xyz point file into an rcp point cloud that can then be used by an AEC professional with autocad or revit. Recap Pro will not recognize the xyz file - it will only open its own native rcp/rcs files. As Meshimages said above, you only need the xyz file from the matterpak. The process to create a deliverable rcp file from the matterpak xyz file is fairly straightforward.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |